What reply are you thanking?
Are you agreeing with the assertion that frauds like Piltdown Man and archioraptor were not uncovered by mainstream biologists? Are you agreeing with the implication that biology is corrupt, and fraud is only uncovered by opponents of evolution?
My response was to thank the correspondent for reply post #358, not to endorse or analyze it or any previous assertions made.
That is my custom for acknowledging a post and discussion which I am watching but not yet engaging.