Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852
No one questions mutation... unless you mutate too much. Creationists seem to allow mutation within kinds but not between kinds. Problem is, they give no clear definition of a kind, which makes their theory irrefutable.

Although, I do agree that much more critical thinking and scientific method courses, (or even one), would be *very* valuable in high school. It would seem to me that a course involving a scientific and critical investigation of spoon bending, ESP, mind-reading, and all the James Randi type investigations would be both valuable and fun. Presumably then you wouldn't need anti-evolution in science because they would already think critically about everything... science, religion, both sides, and everything else.
41 posted on 05/10/2005 5:42:58 AM PDT by crail (Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: crail

A Myth Busters class. Now that would be interesting. And quite difficult. Most anti-science types will not accept the concept of a double-blind experiment.


44 posted on 05/10/2005 5:47:03 AM PDT by js1138 (e unum pluribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: crail

Scientists argue about defining species, don't they? Scientists argue about all sorts of things. Does that make one side wrong and the other right? Who decides?


48 posted on 05/10/2005 5:51:33 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson