[Quix]

And what training etc. leads you to the conclusion that it's quack science?

It's not quack science nor propaganda EXCEPT for the interpretation the idiot gives it about cause and effect which the research doesn't speak to at all but the author pretends it does.

But, like all such science these days--it's just a very tiny slice of the whole reality. Not a lot of robust inferences one can draw from such tiny slices of reality.

But the data on the tiny slice is valid data and not all that different from research the last decade or two in that field.

Are you a chronic skeptic? Chronic naysayer?

[John Lenin]

I'm very skeptical that there is any difference in gay people and straights other than psychological. It's just common sense telling me I'm probably right. I you were meant to be with a man you wouldn't have been born with male plumbing. There are plenty of examples all over the place of straight people turning gay after traumatic experiences of a bad relatiosnhip or being molested as children or having an alcoholic or overbearing parent that these studies are just fishing expeditions looking to create an excuse from the reality of the situation.