Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: minus_273

They were militarily useless propaganda troops. I read about an argument where Hitler sneeringly asked why the Frei Hind were always "refitting" without ever having fought.

But what the article demonstrated, as was clear, was that the British Army of India was no longer politically reliable by 1946. India did not have a large, politically powerful white settler population so once the army turned India was lost.


12 posted on 05/09/2005 9:42:31 AM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Sam the Sham

The Indian Army in WWII eventually totaled 2.5 million men, making it obviously a major combatant. But, as you say, it was not a reliable tool after the war for the British to use in repressing the Indian and Pakistani independence movements.


18 posted on 05/09/2005 9:53:38 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson