[Daryl L.Hunter]

As a conservative I am in the minority in my belief that homosexuality is a Divine or Darwinian way of keeping faulty genetics from reproducing. This Darwinian or Divine probability of survival of the fittest is a possibility that our leaders have a duty to factor even if their faith trumps analytical thought that entertains theological paradox.

That said, I like our culture just the way it is and we shouldn't be tampering with its success.

Citizens For A Freer America & The Upper Valley Free Press

Daryl L. Hunter - Editor

[1john2 3and4]

Since there is no proof that homosexuality is genetic, perhaps your faith in Darwinian "survival of the fittest" has trumped your ability to thoughtfully and honestly analyze the evidence.

The enlarged 7th interstitial nucleus found in cadaver studies, and trumpeted as the genetic link to homosexuality, could be enlarged (hypertrophied) through use, similar to the growth of exercised muscle tissue.

You may recall that the cadaver studies were performed and published by a practicing homosexual.

Sometimes, "I don't know" is the best answer, specifically regarding the nature vs. nurture argument of homosexuality.

Faith is useful for the many "I don't know(s)" of life. I believe that homosexuality is unbridled lust, since it can be "controlled", unlike other genetic traits.

It has been said that the highest praise of God consists in the denial of Him by the atheist, who finds creation so perfect that he can dispense with a creator.
Marcel Proust

[Tamar1973]

As a conservative I am in the minority in my belief that homosexuality is a Divine or Darwinian way of keeping faulty genetics from reproducing.

The only problem with that is there's no proof that homosexuality is genetic.