Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHARLITE

"The problem, Hillary's campaign only declared a cost of $400 thousand resulting in a net additional $800 thousand of "in kind" contribution by Paul. Why is this a problem? Because under Federal Election Law..."

Hold it right there. The problem is that most people don't give a hoot about Federal Election Law--they fixed that, didn't they?--and the MSM isn't about to pick that aspect of the story up...EXCEPT the feds have the lowdown on Paul's Hollywood party from Ray Reggie's tapes, plus two years more documenting misbehavior in the top ranks of the democratic party.

We won't be hearing much about violations of Federal Election Law. What we will hear about is the sex and drugs...but when it goes to court, the illegal fundraising is what will land them in jail.


6 posted on 05/07/2005 8:42:18 PM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cloud8
I agree with what you said in spirit, but Malven has some gems in his screed. Just imagine if Brit Hume were to read this portion verbatim on Special Report:

"Federal prosecutors, in January, unsealed an indictment against Sen. Hillary Clinton's National Finance Director, David F. Rosen. The indictment...indicts Rosen on four counts of knowingly filing, or causing to be filed, false disclosure information with the FEC...Mr. Paul will provide testimony and hard evidence that Sen. Clinton not only knew of the misrepresentation, but that she orchestrated it and other activities in violation of federal election law."

8 posted on 05/07/2005 8:53:12 PM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson