Skip to comments.
The desire for cheap labor
Oakland Tribune ^
| 5/7/05
| Ruben Navarrette Jr. - San Diego U-T
Posted on 05/07/2005 2:32:14 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: NormsRevenge
There is only one answer quit beating our chests and revoke the invitation. Let's direct our enforcement efforts at every restaurant, hotel, construction site, ranch, farm or office complex in America that knowingly hires illegal immigrants in violation of the law. Let's also take a hard look at businesses that play dumb and pretend not to know whom they're hiring. And don't forget the ordinary folks who pull up to the local big-box home-improvement store on Saturday mornings and pull out with a carload of day laborers to help them build a deck or paint a room or plant a garden.DITTO
2
posted on
05/07/2005 2:34:42 PM PDT
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: NormsRevenge
3
posted on
05/07/2005 2:34:42 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: Dubya
Let's also take a hard look at businesses that play dumb and pretend not to know whom they're hiring.There is no "playing dumb". You either had them fill out an I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification form or you didn't.
4
posted on
05/07/2005 2:42:28 PM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: NormsRevenge
I still prefer the idea of no US Citizenship to children born to illegal immigrants while living the USofA. No dual citizenship, either. The parent has to have a Green Card or be a US Citizen, born or naturalized, for the child born in the USofA (or a territory) to be considered a US Citizen.
No Citizenship, No Social Security Card, AND make ALL government agencies, including State Welfare Offices mandated reporters to INS/Homeland Security if an illegal alien applies for benefits.
The Federal and State Governments must hire more Homeland Security agents.
Wanna have some fun? Enter a Big Box Store after midnight and yell 'INS - Homeland Security' and watch the people scatter and run for the exits. (I know someone who did that at a SpraW(a)l-Mart around 3 AM one morning.)
5
posted on
05/07/2005 2:44:13 PM PDT
by
HighlyOpinionated
(Gov'ments 7 Branches: Executive,Legislative,Judicial,Bureaucracy,Lobbies,Political Parties,Media)
To: Dubya
6
posted on
05/07/2005 2:47:16 PM PDT
by
two134711
(If you're too open minded, your brains will fall out.)
To: NormsRevenge
Business owners should be prosecuted. Starting with grocery stores and landscapers and going to big business.
To: South40
To: NormsRevenge
That has about as much chance at success as telling people not to shop at Walmart.
And if you want to see whose names are on all those hard money checks to Republican and Democratic office seekers you will find a huge number of them are the people that hire illegals.
NOTE that nominees for both the Bush and Clinton cabinets had to withdraw because they had hired illegal emigrants and had not paid Social Security on them.
Mark Twain said it over 120 years ago. We have the best congress money can buy.
The people who are against illegals coming to the USA are sending letters, emails, and talking to the media.
The people who are for unlimited illegals in the USA are not talking to anyone.. but they are sending Cash.
To: NormsRevenge
The United States can't actually close the border Wrong
Did for years
Can do again
To: South40; Dubya; DTogo
It's good that instead of just belly-achin' about what we hate, we're saying what we want. Let's go further and talk a bit more about what it is we want and also how we'll do it.
To "take a hard look at businesses" means hiring more feds to review 20 million I-9 forms. We tell every GS-11 investigator to spend a day on each one. At $100 per man-day, we'll have to raise taxes by two billion dollars. That should raise my taxes by about ten bucks. Look. If I thought it would solve the problem I'd give you the money just so we could move on to other things-- but we all know it won't stop at ten bucks.
Anybody got any better ideas before I have to get my wallet out again?
To: NormsRevenge
This was actually put in a newspaper? It's the most unprofessional editorial I have ever seen.
12
posted on
05/07/2005 3:06:45 PM PDT
by
Betaille
(Harry Potter is a Right-Winger)
To: expat_panama
Why do you need to review an I-9 file? If the person is here illegally, they should be cuffed and given an immediate one-way deportation home on the spot. Plus if we fined all the businesses hiring illegals, that would help illeviate some of the costs, not to mention possibly dry up any job opportunities for the illegals and make them want to go home.
Legal immigration? YES.
Illegal immigration? NO!
It's that simple.
13
posted on
05/07/2005 3:06:54 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: DTogo
Illegal immigration? NO! It's that simple.I hope you're not planning on replacing the FBI with a big sign that says 'no more crime'.
To: expat_panama
Anybody got any better ideas before I have to get my wallet out again? Turn enforcement of business employment to the states. The feds can do that. The state can then turn it down to the localities.
Any detainee that can't establish legal status within ten days is transferred to one of ten regional staffed holding facilities, with two transport planes each and crews to man them. As a plane is filled, fly them to one of two staffed deportment facilities on the border with ten buses each, crews for them, and armored escort with crews.
When a bus is filled, take it and its escort across the border well into Mexico and release the people on it.
No more immigrant "looking for work" will come just to face this, and no more insurgents can hide among them.
As the number of illegal Mexicans diminish, facilities can be half-staffed and equipment can be turned to other uses, and facilities can shut down leaving only a couple to carry any subsequent load.
All this is inexpensive at the start and dirt cheap at the end, and I'll doubt any politician behind it would risk reelection. We are a big nation. We can get tough. We have reason to and we have a right to. And the majority wants to.
15
posted on
05/07/2005 3:22:12 PM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: Common Tator
We have the best congress money can buy.Amen
16
posted on
05/07/2005 3:28:12 PM PDT
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: Common Tator; NormsRevenge; farmfriend
Caught yesterdays Washington Journal replay, with a gal from the Manhattan Institute I believe, who was on promoting that all of this illegal immigration was good for us cause businessman needed the labor. The farms needed the labor because without it they would have to shut down the farms and perhaps move them to Mexico and besides they are all hard workers and we are a nation of immigrants....
She was getting hostile calls on both the R and D line, which Brian lamb pointed out to her.....
17
posted on
05/07/2005 3:29:04 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
To: South40
The I-9 form system was designed to fail. As an employer, if you are shown the minimum required (fake) ID from the list which the (illegal) job applicant gets to choose from, you must accept it; it is illegal for you to ask for more or to specify the documentation. This means the illegal only has to buy one or two pieces of fake ID and the employer of illegals is immune from liability. Everybody wins!
18
posted on
05/07/2005 3:34:34 PM PDT
by
MRMEAN
(Nuke the border!)
To: Milwaukeeprophet
Business owners should be prosecuted.Yup, lets see how much they like being raped by their cellmate.
19
posted on
05/07/2005 3:35:23 PM PDT
by
Doe Eyes
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That always happens on the Journal. Brian will have someone who wants benefits for illegal immigration or something to that effect. And that person gets slammed. From both the Dem/Repub side. Its not even close. Even the libs call in pissed off on this topic.
20
posted on
05/07/2005 3:35:24 PM PDT
by
Skeeve14
(De Opresso Liber)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson