Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick

I have no idea how it works, but Mp3 compression technology apparently gets rid of the parts of the recording that are not detectable to all but the most sensitive of ears.

Let's face it... most music these days is not "pure"... they've all been tinkered with during the recording to CD transfer process... especially older albums, which have been remastered.

I have an old Jazz album that still retains the scratchy recording sound. The only thing "authentic" about the experience is that it replicates the inferior recording technology of the 20s/30s. The person hearing it live back then didn't hear those scratchy noises, and I doubt the artist intended those noises to be present either.


41 posted on 05/07/2005 12:42:28 PM PDT by ambrose (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: ambrose
I have no idea how it works, but Mp3 compression technology apparently gets rid of the parts of the recording that are not detectable to all but the most sensitive of ears.

Yes, this is the crux of the problem. I have ridiculously sensitive ears, and the times I've heard MP3 audio I've been disappointed with the quality.

Let's face it... most music these days is not "pure"... they've all been tinkered with during the recording to CD transfer process... especially older albums, which have been remastered.

Naturally there's nothing pure about most music these days given all the processing that happens during recording and mastering. But I'm not interested in absolute universal purity. What I'm interested in is hearing a pure reproduction of the master recording with all its impurities.

That may sound strange, but really not, because not all impurities are created equal. The impurities added during recording and mastering were put there by audio guys to make the music sound better. MP3 and other compression schemes, on the other hand, were designed by computer guys to decrease bandwidth. The one has to do with creating music, the other with saving hardrive space. My ears tend to appreciate the first but not the second.

I have an old Jazz album that still retains the scratchy recording sound. The only thing "authentic" about the experience is that it replicates the inferior recording technology of the 20s/30s. The person hearing it live back then didn't hear those scratchy noises, and I doubt the artist intended those noises to be present either.

Well, I think a scratchy old jazz recording is an exceptional case. What bothers me is hearing high-quality modern recordings that are missing dynamic range and high-frequencies due to MP3 compression.

Like I said, I'm picky :)

54 posted on 05/07/2005 1:53:53 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson