Could any one who is praising Mark Fuhrman tell me why, if he had all this information, he didn't come forward with it while Terri was alive? After all the book is being released just under 3 months after her death. Surely he had all this information earlier.
This is my guess:
In the case of Martha Moxley, the local sheriff investigated but were rather afraid to go against the Skakel family. The Skakel's were not looked at that closely. Verified alibi's with only family members. His investigation forced an investigation to be reopened.
I assume that he is hoping for the same outcome, forcing a reinvestigation.
The lack of agreement on the facts of the case is one of the startling aspects of the story. The controvery had been raging for over 10 years, and one wonders why there weren't journalists in Tampa who were real experts on it. I did rad that the bishop ordered priests to stop preaching about it. Seems to me that there was a corrupt good ole boy aspect that would not serve the people of the city well. It is also surprising that Greer was reelected when $154,000 would have financed an opposing candidate in 2004.
This just shows the danger of having media focus on two or three stories while they ignore everything else. Are they still harassing the runaway bride in GA?
That's a quick release date. It may be pushed back. But I get your point
"Could any one who is praising Mark Fuhrman tell me why, if he had all this information, he didn't come forward with it while Terri was alive?"
Well if the Congress, Senate, President, Pope, Governor Jeb, Florida Senate, Judiciary, Pinellas Co. Police etc..had no effect in stopping this 'legalized murder' just what exactly could Mark Fuhrman do to stop it?