[GSHastings]

Claiming that DNA is complex is hardly evidence that evolution is false.

CLANK ! Sound of mind closing rapidly.

It isn't a case of saying DNA is complex. It's a case of saying that DNA is so mind boggling, astoundingly, unfathonabley, unquestionably complex, that Evolution has absolutely ZERO chance of being true.

It's right there in front of you, but you REFUSE to see it.

[sigSEGV]

mind boggling, astoundingly, unfathonabley, unquestionably complex

Those are awfully scientific terms. Counting to 100 seemed extremely complex when I was 5. Then we later realize that there are ways to manage that complexity and deal with it. Science can deal with some pretty large numbers.

[concerned about politics]

I think the scientific world itself will have to kill Darwinism because its own standards of integrity are not going to permit the great mass of scientists to rely on the kind of obfuscation and misdirection that you have to keep that dying theory alive.

Although the battle between theologians and scientists regarding the origins of man and nature, has raged for decades, an accumulating amount of evidence seems to be causing some scientists to re-examine the role an intelligent designer might have played in the origins of life.

[Joe Republc]

Saying that evolution is hard to believe does NOT mean you have to believe in God or in creationism. But it does say another more plausible theory is sorely needed, even if science doesn't have one now.

-- Joe