Posted on 05/06/2005 12:47:07 PM PDT by jonwill
I looked and couldn't find it, thanks, I tried like 5 searches for it b4 I posted
I really don't think GWB would appreciate this either. Not top mention it gives the left more fodder for their anti Christian dribble.
This is sure making great fodder for the anti-religionists.
It's so obvious that this pastor's actions condemns the whole of Christendom.
On that note, I think we should put all atheists on trial for the crimes of Stalin, Pol-pot. Mao Tse-dung, and Castro. Somebody get my hangin' rope!
At a Catholic Charities fund raiser I attended last night, I mentioned to a nun that I could not understand how any Catholic could vote for a Democrat (since they are the party of baby killers). She answered "that's only one issue", then went off about how many people Bush killed in Texas. I responded about innocent life vs. criminal punishment, and was about to point out that Texas law, not the Governor of Texas determines who is executed. But Mrs. JimRed grabbed me (probably would have strangled me, if she could) and declared politics an inappropriate topic.
With politics off the table, things get boring quickly!
excommunication really doesn't mean much these days.
Since when did we start jumping to conclusions based on what the AP is reporting?
So this guy wants a Taliban like church... never thought of it that way. Let's move in and stop him.
Listen, for every church that is led by a Taliban leader (a female lesbian leader), there are 10s of thousands more that are sound.
What I like about the gesture is it opens up discussion about the support given to a Prolife Bush vesus a ProDeath Catholic John Kerry.
That is one problem with Baptist independence, which is why I support the Presbyterian way, which is the middle of the road (one reason why the American Revolution was called the Presbyterian rebellion in England).
This pastor is going too far in any case.
By Presbyterian I mean a system of checks/balances etc...congregations have power, but other governing bodies do as well.
I understand that you are sorry.
What precisely is "just wrong ?"
Actually, they can. It's just not called excommunication and the consequences aren't the same. It's called "churching" someone. Basically, it means letting a person know that their beliefs or lifestyle aren't consistent with that church's beliefs. For instance, it's been used to cast a unwed pregnant girl from a congregation. Though I don't agree with the practice, it's not without prescedent in the Baptist Church.
According to many on the left, you're already living in a theocracy.
What it does is further splinter/weaken the church in America. We already have splinter churches based on sex what's next democrat and republican denominations?
THis is posted a bunch of times now.
There is one funny thing about the story. It is on TV, which suggests it is current. But if so, why does it talk about people being asked to VOTE for Bush? The election was months ago, and there are no more elections for Bush.
Something isn't right with this story....
It's wrong, only with a JUST in front of it for emphasis. It's not like a ended a sentence with a proposition or some other thing, ain't it?
I know. The Title is sooo totally different. If I did a search I would never have found it either, I just happened to have posted it earlier.
What is wrong ?
Do you even know what happened or is it wrong because the MSM told you it was wrong ?
I wonder if St. Peter will be asking for papers proving support for President Bush...when we arrive at the Big Pearlies.? :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.