Posted on 05/06/2005 11:50:13 AM PDT by Lindykim
To be honest, I've given up. I don't know what the heck he is saying.
Why?
_____________________________________________
Once the gay gene can be identified in utero women will start to abort to avoid having a gay child (remember, no reason is needed at all). Gays will demand protection in utero from these abortions. The dems don't allow for any rights to the unborn (it's the woman's choice). If gay unborn have rights then all unborn have rights. The left will implode, and women will abort in order to avoid having gay kids anyway, decimating the number of gays within two generations.
Yes. Very logical.
Didn't some Republican propose a law banning abortions of homosexual babies? I think it was kind of a joke to confuse the left.
In order to understand what someone is saying you have to know the meaning of the words he uses. Most words have multiple meanings and I was using the word "reason" as a synonym for logical thinking, which doesn't always apply to moral choices.
But here's example where logic is applied to evil moral choices: In the Mafia a "made man" is someone in the inner circle who has "made his bones" -- he has killed someone. Mafia chiefs required this as a condition of acceptance for a very logical reason: A murderer is forced to be loyal to the mob out of necessity. He needs their protection and he can never go straight or he is likely to end up on death row.
The practice also makes it difficult for police "moles" to infiltrate organized crime.
In many ways logic works for evil opposite to the way it does for good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.