Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc

The appeasers have such great p.r. machines around the world. All Blair would have to do to shut them up is ask, if Saddam was such a peace loving fellow, as a sign of good faith, why didn't he hand over Al-Zarqawi and the dozens of other Al-Qaeda operatives in his country before the war? Why did he give Al-qaeda safe harbor? Why did he train them on the use of chemicql weapons at Salamn Pak? Why according to Russia's Putin, was Saddam planning future attacks against America? British intel confirmed that Saddam was attempting to purchse uranium from Niger and we found enriched uranium in Iraq. Based on the U.N. oil for food fiasco and Saddam's lust to buy off sanctions, today a sworn enemy of freedom would have a nuke.
If the good guys woulkd start engaging the public with the facts their elections wouldn't be so close.


3 posted on 05/06/2005 10:12:41 AM PDT by jimfrommaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jimfrommaine

Because, according to the liberals, all of that never happened. They continue to screech "where are the WMDs?" at the top of their voices to drown out the truth of what's going on. Just like the peace-nuts of the 60s and 70s, if they got the form of government they keeping hoping we would have, THEY themselves would be the very first thing THAT new government would wipe out. They're the whiners and complainers of society.


5 posted on 05/06/2005 10:42:06 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson