Skip to comments.
The Executioner (of Adolf Eichmann)
HaMishpacha / aish.com ^
| 1 May 2005
| Rachel Ginsberg
Posted on 05/06/2005 9:04:48 AM PDT by anotherview
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Israel has the death penalty for only one crime: genocide. Adolf Eichmann is the only person ever to have been sentenced to death in Israel.
To: anotherview
Why in the world did Israel decide to pollute their territorial waters with this murderer's ashes? The ashes should have been spread over the same concentration camp that he sent millions to. At the very least, use his ashes as fertilizer.
2
posted on
05/06/2005 9:07:49 AM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: Alouette
3
posted on
05/06/2005 9:13:48 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: anotherview
Glad to know the person for whom there are no words, was incinerated.
4
posted on
05/06/2005 9:16:09 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
To: lilylangtree
OUTSIDE their territorial waters...
5
posted on
05/06/2005 9:21:31 AM PDT
by
null and void
(...that no man, rich or poor, free or bond, shall buy or sell, save he that has the chip...)
To: OldFriend
I think his ashes belonged in a hog yard.
6
posted on
05/06/2005 9:21:39 AM PDT
by
Sterco
To: anotherview
Israel has the death penalty for only one crime: genocide. It would not be inappropriate to apply the crime of genocide to captured terrorists, like Marwan Barghouti, since their stated goal is the eradication of Israel and the genocide of all its Jewish citizens.
7
posted on
05/06/2005 9:32:02 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Proudly overpopulating the planet since 1972.)
To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A Jovial Cad; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; adam_az; af_vet_rr; agrace; ahayes; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel ping list.
WARNING: This is a high volume ping list
8
posted on
05/06/2005 9:32:51 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Proudly overpopulating the planet since 1972.)
To: lilylangtree
Why in the world did Israel decide to pollute their territorial waters with this murderer's ashes? From the article: "...where a Coast Guard boat carried them beyond Israel's territorial waters, so that they would not defile the Holy Land."
9
posted on
05/06/2005 9:34:23 AM PDT
by
AzSteven
To: anotherview
From the description, it sounds like his neck was not broken, and thus, he died a horrible, asphixiation death. The rope had worn off some skin of his neck, he had struggled and suffered horribly.
Good.
10
posted on
05/06/2005 9:37:13 AM PDT
by
Paradox
("It is well that war is so terrible, lest we grow too fond of it."- Robert E. Lee)
To: anotherview
from his being given his last glass of wine...How many of the six million who went to the chambers at Auschwitz, Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, et al were accorded the same courtesy?
11
posted on
05/06/2005 9:38:42 AM PDT
by
meandog
(FU-DU lurkers)
To: anotherview
I wonder if Alois Bruenner is still alive and still
in Damascus? He is the only one of Eichmann's assistants
remaining alive (as of 2000). Israel still has some
unfinished buisness with him.
He would be in his late 90's.
Its ironic that so many ran to South America - if they had
remained in Germany to face German courts they might have
recieved a prison term, as did the Einsatzkommados in the
late 60's.
12
posted on
05/06/2005 9:48:48 AM PDT
by
rahbert
To: Alouette
Shalom Nagar, having retired from the Prisons Services, was living in Kiryat Arba and
learning in kollel from dawn to midnight.
What does this mean?
13
posted on
05/06/2005 9:54:02 AM PDT
by
jla
To: anotherview
This is NOT an anti-business or anti-capitalism post.
But an interesting historical sidelight to me is that Eichmann, in carrying out Hitler's orders, used the data processing equipment of a very successful American corporation to keep track of the whole Final Solution process, from keeping track of families by street address, to scheduling of trains and boxcars between departure points the arrivals at the death camps to shipping of foodstuffs (they didn't want to send too much, apparently).
The administration of the whole grisly process was so huge and involved that Eichmann's administration gave free data processing classes to German citizens, then put them to work when they had completed the course.
14
posted on
05/06/2005 9:54:35 AM PDT
by
righttackle44
(Whenever I get my haircut, I lose my Mexican heritage for three weeks. . . .)
To: meandog
Don't worry, it was French wine. It was a punishment.
15
posted on
05/06/2005 9:54:43 AM PDT
by
fish hawk
(I am only one, but I am not the only one.)
To: meandog
16
posted on
05/06/2005 9:56:49 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: meandog
17
posted on
05/06/2005 9:57:20 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: Alouette
It would not be inappropriate to apply the crime of genocide to captured terrorists, like Marwan Barghouti, since their stated goal is the eradication of Israel and the genocide of all its Jewish citizens.While I can't disagree with you I think you and I both know why it won't happen. The results would be an upsurge in Palestinian terrorist attacks and it could even be the pretext for some Arab nations to join in a war against us. For a people that cherish the sanctity of life it simply isn't worth it to execute Barghoutti. That's what is so different about the Jewish people when compared to our enemies. We place the highest value of all on human life. If executing Barghoutti would mean more Jewish deaths is can't be justified.
18
posted on
05/06/2005 10:01:21 AM PDT
by
anotherview
("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
To: jla
Mr. Nagar is spending his life studying the (Jewish) scriptures, most especially the Torah.
19
posted on
05/06/2005 10:04:14 AM PDT
by
anotherview
("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
To: anotherview
Why was Israel allowed to get away with the kidnapping and execution of a person who had never been in their country? What did the U.N. have to say after the fact?
20
posted on
05/06/2005 10:06:18 AM PDT
by
LetsRok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson