Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ILurkedIRegisteredIPosted
You seem to be overlooking the technological threat posed by Saddam's scientific community and apparatus. While the former dictator probably was not a direct threat he certainly posed by proxy more than an acceptable level. Do not for even one minute separate the war on terror with Iraq, as it is far more comprehensive than you might imagine. You would do well to note that logistically we are now in a position to closely monitor and intercede in either Iran or Saudi Arabia should the situation warrant such action.
42 posted on 05/06/2005 2:22:59 PM PDT by Camel Joe (Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Camel Joe

Umm, yes. I'd like to see how you propose that we invade Iran and Saudi Arabia while holding Iraq without sending literally almost our entire army to the region. The U.S. doesn't have the resources in the Iraq to simultaneously hold it and fight a ground war with Iran. One estimate I have seen is that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has about 100,000 troops. They may be not as good as ours, but last I checked we have only 140,000 people in Iraq and we are still responsible for security over there.

I have been convinced for a while that it'll take either a North Korean or an Iranian nuclear bomb frying either part of the U.S. or a bunch of our troops to get Bush's supporters to admit that Iraq was a mistake. The U.S. has barely been able to keep the peace in Iraq today, just imagine what would happen if our troops were committed to two or three conflicts at once. I bet you Syria and Iran would attack us on both fronts and thousands of fresh insurgents from Saudi Arabia would arrive in Iraq to pick our guys off in the streets.

We should have hit North Korea first and then Iran. With Iran taken care of, Afghanistan's Western border would have been secured and Iraq would have been vulnerable to a very large land invasion.


43 posted on 05/06/2005 3:01:02 PM PDT by ILurkedIRegisteredIPosted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Camel Joe
"While the former dictator probably was not a direct threat he certainly posed by proxy more than an acceptable level."

North Korea has nuclear weapons, is building more, and is developing missiles that could carry them to Washington, DC (the Tae-po Dong III). The missiles they have now(Tae-po Dong II) may, possibly, be capable of hitting the west coast of the United States, as per Senate testimony by one Dick Cheney prior to his becoming Vice President. North Korea is also the world's largest black market weapons supplier. They sell weapons to anyone with cash. This suggests that once they have sufficient nuclear devices to attend to their own needs, they'll begin selling them to whomever will finance their dying regime.

Now, which one's the larger threat?
47 posted on 05/06/2005 4:56:13 PM PDT by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson