"Huh and tancredo's remarks saying Tom Delay should step aside are not irrational."
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the above because of the lack of punctuation, but I assume you're saying that Tancredo's statement was irrational. That is an opinion. It's not a fact. I disagree with his statement but in my opinion it was not irrational, it was simply incorrect. It does not mean that he is incorrect about everything.
I've seen you pop up on every thread where Tancredo is mentioned and divert attention away from the discussion of the policy, with your relentless mantra of "backstabber." Why? Is it that important to you that Tancredo be torn down? Or is it simply that you're trying to, by association, discredit his ideas. Again, why not debate the ideas? I have to assume that it's because you want no discussion of the ideas.
Whew the above is clinton semantics in action.
Yunz guys in hillary's basement must be sweating bullets about this thread.