Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl
Legal experts had mixed views yesterday about whether the courts would allow California to create a border patrol to control illegal immigration

What would be the legal difference between this agancy and the California National Guard? Aren't they charged with protecting the state's borders?

7 posted on 05/06/2005 7:01:27 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls; calcowgirl

"What would be the legal difference between this agancy and the California National Guard? Aren't they charged with protecting the state's borders?"

EXACTLY!

And if Ahnold had the balls he would call out the California National Guard and station them just inside the border on the CA side. PERIOD!

All this talk, talk, talk is nothing but that, JUST TALK!

And I wish someone would explain to me why the CA Attorney General has not filed a lawsuit against the feds to recover the NINE BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR that it's costing us to alllow the illegals to stay here!
Helloooooooo???

Semper Fi,
Kelly


10 posted on 05/06/2005 8:32:53 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson