Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: No Longer Free State
but most of the discipline was administrative punishment such as a formal letter of reprimand or a discharge from the military, the Army said.

And that is entirely appropriate. Not doing your job properly is not a crime, but may be a subject for disciplinary action. Anyone who actually knew what was going on, and didn't either stop it or report it up the chain of command, is an accessory to the crime, if crime there be of course, and is subject to criminal penalties.

The General Colonel failed to do her job properly. Pfc. Lynndie England's sperm donor committed a crime by ordering those under him to commit one. (Again, if crime there be). The underlings who obeyed those orders probably committed a crime also, but if it was not completely clear that it was a crime, then they were only guilty of ignorance, because enlisted personnel must obey orders unless they know them to be illegal.

7 posted on 05/05/2005 8:31:04 PM PDT by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Not doing your job properly is not a crime, but may be a subject for disciplinary action.

No true. Karpinski was a commanding officer, and could have been court-martialed under at least 3 of the punitive articles of the UCMJ. I sense that she struck a deal, which ultimately kept others out of the limelight.

38 posted on 05/06/2005 6:41:34 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson