Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia spoke Thursday to an overflow crowd at the George Bush Presidential Library Center as part of the Twanna M. Powell Lecture Series. The series is an endowed program sponsored by the George Bush Presidential Library Foundation and designed to bring distinguished leaders and recognized experts to the Texas A&M campus to speak regarding major public policy issues and related topics.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Scalia for Chief Justice.
50 posted on
05/05/2005 5:08:34 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(Something wicked this way comes)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Is he saying that diversity is not a legitimate interest of the federal government since it is not mentioned in the Constitution? That will not make the Bush crowd happy.
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
A living Constitution would be the death of the Republic.
55 posted on
05/05/2005 5:26:06 PM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
( Nuke the energy crisis- let's conserve the sun,wind and tides, for future generations.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The reason the Constitution should not be messed with is that it addresses the weaknesses, quirks, and ambitions of human nature, which hasn't changed since we arrived.
60 posted on
05/05/2005 5:32:24 PM PDT by
Marauder
(Politicians use words the way a squid uses ink.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Didn't Pope John Paul II and doesn't Pope Benedict XVI say something similar about the Bible when it speaks on subjects such as homosexuality and other topics recently in the news?
Just asking.
68 posted on
05/05/2005 6:26:06 PM PDT by
HighlyOpinionated
(Gov'ments 7 Branches: Executive,Legislative,Judicial,Bureaucracy,Lobbies,Political Parties,Media)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Radix; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; LaDivaLoca; Fawnn; bentfeather; ...
Justice Scalia ping.
I didn't check to see how many of you looked at this and replied, but this is a great article.
87 posted on
05/06/2005 4:54:16 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(TV News and the MSM - - - ROTFLMAO)
To: Badray
104 posted on
05/06/2005 12:13:04 PM PDT by
Badray
(If you don't want to change your mind, at least get some more info and make a new decision.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
If he believes what he is saying, he really screwed up on the Earls case.
106 posted on
05/06/2005 2:27:15 PM PDT by
Ed_in_NJ
(Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The Constitution is not a living document. Its a legal document, and legal documents do not change.This isn't going to be well received in liberal land.
For that matter, there are some right here at FR who believe that the Constitution is a living document who won't receive this well either.
It's already out there in their posts, saved forever, for those who care to look.
Going to have to remember that line..."Its a legal document, and legal documents do not change." Scalia
130 posted on
05/07/2005 10:08:01 PM PDT by
philman_36
("It’s a legal document, and legal documents do not change." Scalia)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson