Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wk4bush2004
I know you couldn't do the same things with an Airbus A340.

Any idea of what she is describing is 'required' or is Boeing going for beyond the FAA requirement?
5 posted on 05/05/2005 1:41:34 PM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Daus

Boeing is probably going above and beyond. Boeing is a lot more technologically advanced than Airbus and its planes are more capable than Airbus.

The 777-200LRs sister, the 777-300ER, managed to fly over the Pacific Ocean for 6 hours & 29 minutes---on 1 engine! That overwhelmingly surpassed FAA requirements. I'm sure the 777-200LR will be able to do the same.


7 posted on 05/05/2005 1:45:02 PM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Daus
Theoretically,as I recall, per the regulations, a 4-engine aircraft is supposed to be able to lose two engines on takeoff at max gross takeoff weight after having accelerated to a certain speed, continue the takeoff, and maintain a positive climb gradient.

Then again, you're not supposed to be able to kick the rudder off at low speeds, either.

10 posted on 05/05/2005 1:48:49 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson