Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Semper Paratus

I agree: strange politics but an honorable soldier.


51 posted on 05/05/2005 11:05:18 AM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: All

Col. Hackworth (correctly) was displeased with the conduct of the VietNam war (it was run by civilians, often against military advice) and was not one of the stereotypical ticket-punching officers who kissed ass on the Pentagon as soldiers and marines won battles, only to have the victories taken away by Washington, liberals, and the NEW Left. Although he did not keep up to speed on the integration of the Armed Forces branches as applied to modern warfare ('a la General Franks) and lacked adequate knowlege of newer weapons, logistics and tactics, he was a soldiers' officer and a division/batallion tactical battlefield genious.

Goodbye, Sir.


103 posted on 05/05/2005 11:24:42 AM PDT by Nucluside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: DTogo; All

RIP Colonel


240 posted on 05/05/2005 2:08:25 PM PDT by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson