Care to actually refute the points made in the article? I don't agree with all of them, but especially on immigration and spending, I think the writer is spot-on (I think he whines too much about the WMDs, among other things).
Yeah, that's what concerns me. Fiscal management and the ability to protect the integrity of national borders are fundamental to good government. They are to government what blocking and tackling are to a football team.
The budget could be balanced. The immigration mess could be corrected. It really just amazes me to see the choices that are being made.
Ten years down the road, how will all this be judged?