[Faraday]

OK...the two candidates who got the most votes in history and on a percentage basis of voters higher than in many decades, were weak. You are confusing your attitudes with reality. Maybe you can suggest who would have been stronger candidates than Bush or Kerry. By which I mean, someone who whould have received either more votes or a significantly higher percentage.

[Phantom Lord]

Maybe you can suggest who would have been stronger candidates than Bush or Kerry. By which I mean, someone who whould have received either more votes or a significantly higher percentage.

As I said earlier, what ifs and hypotheticals are useless.

But maybe you can tell me what the #1 source of support for John Kerry was if it was not the lefts hate filled ABB.

Seriously, outside of "not being Bush", what about John Kerry garnered him the support he got?

[joesbucks]

Well, from the Repubican side, no one had the balls to take President Bush on. Even, though he not my idea of the ideal candidate, but he does like to tilt at windmills, Alan Keyes was decidedly quiet and did not mount a primary challenge. When Keyes ain't got the balls to do something..........

On the democratic side, what about Zell or for that matter what about Nunn? John Breux?