Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesbucks

Oh, it's true that the country was narrowly divided. If the Democrats had only nominated a candidate who promised to raise taxes (like Mondale did in 1984), Bush would have probably gotten a higher percentage. Frankly, given the Clinton recession, the economic hit from 9/11, leadership shown in taking out Saddam which alienated some natural political allies, the rabid opposition by the international elites, the MSM, as well as an energized Democratic left (and a few carping conservatives), the President's increase in both absolute and percentage terms over the 2000 result was impressive.


151 posted on 05/05/2005 11:25:51 AM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Faraday
C'mon. I'm gald Bush won. But to take the popular vote by about 2.5% and a modest gain in electorial votes does not equate to blow out, mandate or any other of the superlatives that are bandied here.

Frankly, it would have been a lot higher is the President didn't single handedly blow life back into Kerry during the 1st debate. The Swifty's had dealt Kerry a death blow. Bush played Jesus to Kerry's Lazarus and brought him back to life.

155 posted on 05/05/2005 12:04:56 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson