My "hunch" is that China is up to no good. Maybe, just maybe, they are using information warfare tactics. No way, the Clintons and Kerry and all their hangers-on said it can not be so! Just a hunch that China's behind some bad stuff. We should say... "That wasn't nice" ... Now, let's see, are there any snakes we can train to take them on also? They mess with the bull, they get the horns. Bulls don't like Red.
Check out these links when you have some spare time:
http://www.sinodefence.com/c4i/default.asp
http://www.sinodefence.com/c4i/ew/ew.asp
http://users.bigpond.net.au/pongrass/security/security.htm (SMH, 8/18/2001)
http://www.specialoperations.com/Foreign/China/IW.htm
http://www.ceip.org/programs/info/infowar.htm
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/warfare/896.php
http://www.global-defence.com/2000/pages/china.html
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/china/docs/iw_mg_wang.htm
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2003/09/04/2003066387
http://www.gyre.org/news/related/Information+Warfare/China
http://www.rand.org/publications/CF/CF145/CF145.chap9.pdf
http://www.strategypage.com/fyeo/howtomakewar/default.asp?target=HTIW.HTM
http://www.herolibrary.org/p113.htm (Chinese, sic)
http://www.iwar.org.uk/iwar/resources/news/china-io-2003.htm
http://www.iwar.org.uk/iwar/resources/china/iw/chininfo.pdf
http://www.infowar-monitor.net/
http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/pubs/display.cfm/hurl/PubID=62
http://www.fas.org/news/taiwan/1999/cn-08-17-99-11.htm (1999)
http://www.taiwansecurity.org/AP/2002/AP-072902.htm (AP 2002)
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/chinview/chinacont.html
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-info.htm
http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/bibs/IWbooks.htm (IW resources)
Ref:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200506/kaplan (Atlantic - Kaplan - 05 - sic)
http://www.voanews.com/english/2005-03-23-voa76.cfm (VOA March 23, 2005)
http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=408&issue_id=3232&article_id=2369263 (Jamestown February 15, 2005)
http://www.csis.org/burke/hd/#reports (CSIS – resources)
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/FMSOPUBS/ISSUES/china-internet.htm
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/warfare/ (SANS)
http://www.fofg.org/news/news_story.php?doc_id=782 (May 13, 2004)
http://armedservices.house.gov/issues/opeds/03-09-12tcs-china.html (HASC, 9/12/03)
http://www.space.com/news/china_dod_030801.html (August 1, 2003 – Space)
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/20030730chinaex.pdf (annual PRC report July 2003)
http://www.military-information-technology.com/article.cfm?DocID=51 (November 15, 2002)
http://www.cia.gov/nic/speeches_telecommunications.html (CIA – Gannon - April 2001)
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-01c.html (Space Daily Jan 2000)
http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/BG1340.cfm (Heritage - Wortzel - December 2, 1999)
http://www.ndu.edu/inss/siws/ch1.html (William Fast)
http://www.aracnet.com/~kea/Papers/threat_white_paper.shtml (Kent Anderson, 1998)
http://www.securityfocus.com/library?cat=132&offset=70 (Inf. Ops /IW 1996
When I first entered the Army in '75, I elected Mandarin Chinese as my foreign language of choice figuring I was going to need it eventually. Looking back thirty years later, not a single thing has happened to make me change my mind.
If my instincts in real estate and the stock market had been 1/10th as good, this message would have been typed by my personal Freeping assistant.