He does deserve some sympathy, though, because of his disability. He has lost use of his arms, as they are always engaged in patting himself on the back.
He does not stand for anything. His "opinions" are simply based on whatever will get him ratings. In this regard, he is no better than Bill Clinton.
Michael claims that his ratings is great, But the truth is that Mark Levin on Wabc 770 Ny has much bette ratings than savage, But look what the angry Savage write on his site...
Michael Savage Bucks Trend; Leaps on WOR
While talk radio in general lost a large percentage of its core audience from the preceding three months, Michael Savage bucked that trend on WOR (in NYC persons 12+). In his 6 PM hour, he achieved a 3.3 share; his 7 PM hour pulled an astonishing 3.9 share, and in his 8 PM hour he pulled a 3.3 share.
By not pushing the Republican Party line, Savage who identifies himself as an independent conservative continues to draw new listeners, while other conservative talkers lose audience.
Not for nothing, but Rush also has a big ego. "Talent on loan from God". I am not criticising either of them, because I happen to like them both, even though I do like Savage more. Both of them have big egos, and they both deserve to have them... I think they are doing good jobs.