Posted on 05/04/2005 3:07:20 PM PDT by smoothsailing
She's on H&C tonight. Malkin on OReilly also. A 2fer of conservative babes.
More liberal "tolerance" on display... /sarcasm
There was fun with this story today:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1396648/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1396596/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1396518/posts
I'm sick of these liberals who always clamor for free speech unless it's a conservative trying to speak.
Last week we saw Bill Kristol speak at DeSales University. He had been recently "pied" at another college for trying to speak.
Umm, don't we have rules about Ann Coulter posts?
what was Nick Coleman doing there???
"Vietnam Vets = Baby Killers" but "Abortionists = Pro Choice"
Life as a liberal must totally suck.
Brown Shirts! They're just a bunch of Brown Shirts. Their actions are no different than those Nazi thugs.
I can see the scumbag being fined by the University, and definitely being made to leave the evnt for disrupting.
But arrested? I dunno...That can cut two ways.
Nice .gif
And nice gams.
The future of the Democrat party. I love it!
But arrested? I dunno...That can cut two ways.
Read the story. It plainly says that he was arrested for RESISTING the nice officers when they asked him to leave.
When it's time to go and the officers tell you it's time to leave and you don't leave....you open yourself up for further action.
The "radicals" don't care if they turn people off. They are enacting a fantasy in which they are the heroes of the downtrodden. In this fantasy, everyone present has a role to play - the speaker, the administration, the police, and the protesters - all have their assigned roles. It's a role playing game that makes them feel important.
... so ....classy..
Are the free speech advocates paying attention here? What do those liberals have to say about such behavior? More and more, I think some commentators are correct: Liberals have nothing else to fall back upon. Facts fail them, logic fails them and alleged common sense fails them. I suspect that, in the future, political debate with liberals will require megaphones and tomatoes! :)
Why, that it represents the heart and soul of America, of course.
Note to the Dems: My heart and soul don't reside in a sewer.
And BTW, if it was just about a bias in favor of heterosexual sex, polyandry and polygamy would be legal, wouldn't they?
Ann should have told him: "The personal acts between you and your mother are not the subject of this Q&A period!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.