Replies

Why should I do that.?.. Matchett can defend himself fully..

And he did so quite eloquently, by reiterating a claim that had already been proven false. Which means that there could be no doubt with an assumption that Matchett-PI might have been mistaken. No, with his arrogant response, he proved to all that he was just lying.

Can only hope to read the chicken plucking your gonna git..

And why am I going to be 'gitting' a 'chicken plucking'? Because I expose someone's blatant lies?

I'm a just water boy in Matchetts-PI's corner..

Yes, you're one lying creationist defending another. Hardly surprising. It's so rare for one creationist to ever admonish another for outright lying, no matter how obvious it is, and since you're as much of a liar as Matchett-PI, there's no chance that you'd risk accusations of hypocracy in addition to dishonesty.

[ And he did so quite eloquently, by reiterating a claim that had already been proven false. ]

Ah! PROOF.. thats what this is all about.. ain't it..
Proving the unprovable.. If you have an agenda then proof becomes dogma...
I gag down the ceationist side somewhat but thats really unprovable also.. I would gag down a bit of Darminism too but the only problem to me is the Darwinists themselves.. A feather evolved from a scale.. really.. Adam and Eve is at least a good metaphor.. and very good way to answer childrens fears that they are just "MEAT" on the hoof.. for some predator.. Evolution on the other hand is fairy tale for adults, actually a nightmare.. as much as I can determine.. The good guys MUST win else I'm not playin..

And they are winning.. Betcha more Evos abort their children than Creationists do..