[js1138]

uh... sounds more reasonable than it being proof that they were once lizards.

Your ignorance make you and those who argue with you look silly and stupid. If you want to debate, at least take the trouble to find out what your opponent really says.

[Terriergal]

Your ignorance make you and those who argue with you look silly and stupid. If you want to debate, at least take the trouble to find out what your opponent really says.

I spent many years learning the stuff... funny how we conservatives can think the Publick screwels are right on this one issue, and wrong on everything else.

[Terriergal]

Your ignorance make you and those who argue with you look silly and stupid.

Besides, it really doesn't matter what I look like. The facts speak for themselves for those who actually want to look at them.

The main issue continues to be:

Since no one, neither creationists nor evolutionists, has explained HOW something has arisen from nothing, other to say either "God did it" or "evolution must have" - the choice, at least for now, comes down to:

1. BY FAITH believing in natural causes
OR
2. BY FAITH believing in a transcendent intellect which created it all.

There is no third option.

AFTER making one of those choices, one then should ask themselves WHY, in the absence of scientific evidence for something arising from nothing, do you, as an individual, choose what you choose?