[hosepipe]

[ And you claim that "non-evo" scientists exposed them, yet you cannot demonstrate that this claim is true. ]

And its important to you that the "scientist" would NOT be a creationist believer.?.

-or- Thats its not even possible to be a creationist and scientist at the same time.?. especially a paleontologist.?.

What.?. spit it out..

This site is not a "scientic" forum.. I don't have a dog in that fight anyway but believe what I believe and a nameless handle on Free republic wouldn't change that anyways.. Surely you don't believe that it would.. do you.?.

[Dimensio]

And its important to you that the "scientist" would NOT be a creationist believer.?.

No, but you are trying to argue that evolution-accepting scientists are not the ones exposing the frauds. Stop trying to turn your dishonesty around. Either support your claim that the frauds were uncovered by scientists who don't accept evolution or admit that you fabricated your claims because you don't have a real argument.