[narby]

All those instances can be answered by physics and chemistry, Darwinian macroevolutionis not explained by lawlike behaviors.

You wanted self organizing systems of matter, and didn't qualify the method used.

I could have said "evolution" as well, but obviously you aren't going there.

Have you read the link to the DNA evidence for evolution I've posted a couple of times today? It's awesome.

The only person who doesn't believe the fact of evolution after that post obviously belongs on the OJ Jury. DNA always was over those folks heads.

[metacognative]

I will read it and get back to you later.....

[microgood]

Have you read the link to the DNA evidence for evolution I've posted a couple of times today? It's awesome.

The problem with your DNA evidence is rampant throughout biology: correlation does not equal causation. But no biologist or evolutionists seem to understand that fact.

[metacognative]

I think there's a lot to be learned about the role of viruses in genetics. This post reminds me a lot of the claims of "junk" DNA" that did not pan out.
Why don't you restate what you think this proves?