To: mlc9852
Different styles of review
Peer review can be rigorous, in terms of the skill brought to bear, without being highly stringent. An agency may be flush with money to give away, for example, or a journal may have few impressive manuscripts to choose from, so there may be no use to being picky. Conversely, when either funds or publication space is limited, peer review may be used to select an extremely small number of proposals or manuscripts.
Often the decision of what counts as "good enough" falls entirely to the editor or organizer of the review. In other cases, referees will each be asked to make the call, with only general guidance from the coordinator on what stringency to apply.
...
Criticisms of peer review
...
In addition, some sociologists of science argue that peer review makes the ability to publish susceptible to control by elites and to personal jealousy. Reviewers tend to be especially critical of conclusions that contradict their own views, and lenient towards those that accord with them. At the same time, elite scientists are more likely than less established ones to be sought out as referees, particularly by high-prestige journals or publishers. As a result, it has been argued, ideas that harmonize with the elite's are more likely to see print and to appear in premier journals than are iconoclastic or revolutionary ones, which accords with Thomas Kuhn's well-known observations regarding scientific revolutions.
However, others have pointed out that there is a very large number of scientific journals in which one can publish, making control of information difficult. In addition, the decision-making process of peer review, in which each referee gives his opinions separately and without consultation with the other members, is intended to mitigate some of these problems.
131 posted on
05/04/2005 2:40:19 PM PDT by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: AndrewC
"Reviewers tend to be especially critical of conclusions that contradict their own views, and lenient towards those that accord with them." So let's get those reviewers out of the system and everything will be fine!
141 posted on
05/04/2005 2:47:37 PM PDT by
Gumlegs
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson