[Dimensio]

And why wouldn't other scientists take them seriously?

Lack of peer review. You want something taken seriously, submit it to peer review.

Creationists aren't terribly familiar with that concept.

How many scientists have actually examined these new-found fossils?

Not many if they've not been subjected to peer review. Are you paying attention, or are you just trying to argue for lack of anything intelligent to say?

[mlc9852]

How many scientists are normally involved in peer review? How diversified are they or all they are employed by the same sponsors? Who has the final say?