Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
I had no idea you were such an expert in understanding the context of the financial aid underwriters...otherwise--I would've addressed you directly.

Why don't you read and heed the quote on your home page...you have no idea what I am, and am not OK with.

99 posted on 05/04/2005 1:07:58 PM PDT by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Lou L
Your [incorrect] assertion about the intent behind the rule offers support for the rule that is not necessary. There is not a single shred of evidence that the rule change was requested or supported by loan underwriters - and if it was they are idiots, because the rules do not say anything about the vast majority of illegal substance abuse on college campuses - alcohol abuse.

This was WoD politics. Nothing more. And there is nothing in the shadowy world of loan underwriting that justifies the rule.

If I mistakenly assumed you don't find the rule offensive, based upon your excuse-making for it, fine. Say you don't like it.

Now, I'm going to his the post button. Once.

103 posted on 05/04/2005 1:20:23 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson