Posted on 05/04/2005 6:58:27 AM PDT by demkicker
David Rosen, former National Finance Director of Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign, is under a four-count federal indictment charging that he "knowingly and willfully caused to be made materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements" to the Federal Election Commission regarding more than $1 million in campaign contributions. Each of the four felony counts carries a possible penalty of five years in prison and $250,000 in fines.
This is the most massive fraud ever charged against a political campaign by the U.S. Government.
The criminal charges against Rosen stem from the largest fundraiser on behalf of Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign. The August 12, 2000 Hollywood Gala Salute to President Clinton featured performances by Cher, Diana Ross, Toni Braxton, Patti LaBelle, Melissa Etheridge, Sugar Ray and Michael Bolton. The event cost organizer Peter Paul more than $1.2 million to host, and raised $1 million in "hard money" contributions. By falsely reporting those costs as $401,419, the Clinton campaign avoided paying at least $800,000 in hard money -- not including the fair market value of the performances -- during the crucial final weeks before the election. If Paul's contribution had been reported fully as required by law, it could have bankrupted the campaign.
Peter Paul's extensive evidence, which we will organize and present on this site, shows clearly that Hillary Clinton knew of the actions taken by her finance director, and that she orchestrated those actions and others in violation of federal campaign statutes and regulations.
Mr. Paul is being represented in his ongoing civil suit against the Clintons by the U.S. Justice Foundation, which has formed the Hillary Clinton Accountability Project to put the facts of the most massive and least reported campaign finance scandal in history before the American people.
Hillary Clinton with Peter Paul, her most generous campaign contributor
Ping.
Why not? It's worked for her in every other phase of her life.
No, she did it the old fashioned way. She slept her way to the top.
Is the Pope Catholic?
Does a bear **** in the woods?
Will the sun rise in the east?
Kill and more. . .wonder what was the 'he said/she said' or 'she said/he said' that generated these two incompatible gazes???
Another one of those purely rhetorical questions.
Her whole life is a fraud, that is true. Her husband is perhaps the biggest phony ever to run for office.
I was surprised also to see that HRC won that election in 2000 with only 51.3% of the total NY vote. If you believe the regular media you would think it was a huge landslide. The 2-party vote does show a 9 or 10 percent spread between her and Ric Lazio. However, there was a substantial 3rd party vote, so Hillary's total was barely over the 50% threshhold.
If GWB's 50.7% in 2004 is not a mandate, then neither is Hillary's 51.3!
.....She slept her way to the top.......
YYYYYYUUUCCCKKKK!
BBBBAAAAARRRRRRRFFFFF!
As to the question we need only ask; 'do birds fly. . .fish swim'?
Which is to ask. . .do Demrat's cheat, lie. . .steal their way to elections. . .dance on their Mother's grave for a vote?
"Did Hillary Clinton win her Senate seat through fraud?"
Couldn't have done it any other way! The Clintons wouldn't know how to tell the truth or act honestly -- it is not in their genetic make up. They are morally bankrupt.
Does a bear crap in the woods? She is as phony as a three dollar bill. She was crapped on a fence post and hatched out by a crow.
I am guessing as well; that the newspaper clipping is not from the NYT's or Washington Post. . .
Do you think a little thing like that is going to prevent her from getting re-elected to the Senate, nominated for President, or actually being elected President?
Hillary may have raised dirty money, she played games with pardons with the Hasidim, but she won her seat by a million or so votes and the money didn't make that much of a difference. New Yorkers were buying what she was selling that year, end of story. If Hillary played completely by the book she still would have won.
Her whole life is a fraud, that is true. Her husband is perhaps the biggest phony ever to run for office.
-----
I saw Paul's interview on Fox last night. He admitted to his complicity and blew the whistle on the Clintons right on the air. Yes, Bonnie and Clyde are as guilty (what's new, right?) as they are a couple of fraudulent charlatans.
And yet we could hear a pin drop with the coverage the MSM is giving it.
Come on !!! there's no room dark enough for her to sleep her way up .. .. ..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.