Nope. I asked you two simple questions. You failed to answer them and, instead, threw a temper tantrum.
I then dissected the "logic" of your post, and you, again, threw a temper tantrum.
BTW, there ought to be some sort of "Godwin's Law" concerning the word "liberal" around here.
Nope. What you actually did, of course, was (take notes, now; this is all going to be on your final) change what was plainly posted into whatever non-existent "points" you wished to debate, instead. This is commonly referred to, online, as "setting up straw men," and is seldom considered the hallmark of intellectually honest posters. Hint, hint.
You failed to answer them and, instead, threw a temper tantrum.
Incorrect Statement #2: I then dissected the "logic" of your post, and you, again, threw a temper tantrum.
Nope. Just pointed out the inherent dishonesty in your approach, was all.
Online debate can be a rough game. Buy a jock.
BTW, there ought to be some sort of "Godwin's Law" concerning the word "liberal" around here.
Ideally, we can institute one the very same day all liberal schools of "argument" are, likewise, stigmatized. I know I have a nominee or two in mind.