Posted on 05/04/2005 5:59:04 AM PDT by OESY
You sure do like that word needlebutt. I find that odd for a Christian. But I guess it's just un-Christian, even anti-Christian me.
And the Perpetually Disturbed are into Day 6, I see.
You just don't get it do you? There is no reasoned argument which would work for you. Precisely what you don't get is not that you believe yourself a good Christian but that you are perceived thusly. Instead of putting your lips in action, or letting you anonymous fingers fly on the keyboard, I suggest you put your hands together and pray.
Very much so.
Like I said, it's pure stupidity.
Your story about Truman:
ROFLMAO!
So I see; all the while wailing about ad hominem attacks, failing to take into account they're doing the same dang thing. Go figure.
That's quite scholarly.
Thank you for posting it.
My daughter asked me the same question ( She had heard the word "pornography" on TV)
So I gave her an answer much like yours.
She turned beet-red, made a face and said "Eeeeewwww! GROSS!".
She's easily embarrassed.
ROFL!
You're on a roll today!
Well, it's not really my story.
Reader's Digest was printing scatological filth like that more than 40 years ago.
A yes,
Reader's Digest.
My grandmother subscribed to that.
Grandma was pretty racy!
Day 6 and it's a tossup between being perpetually disturbed and perpetually stupid. Rush just played the joke and those who are offended aren't even mentioning the setup of the joke which was the Yale agriculture program (of which Yale has none). If one were going to live and earn the life of a cowboy or farmer, they wouldn't attend Yale, but they would attend a university such as Montana State University where they have one of the best rodeo teams in the country as well as one of the largest Ag Sciences program in the country. You can easily spot the Ag Sciences students at Montana State, they're all wearing cowboy hats, boots, and dusters.
It's important for liberals to keep this issue alive as long as possible to inflict the most damage upon the Bush family.
Regarding the horse joke, notice that the offense taken is sexual in nature. Now ask yourself: What kind of a human being can take the primary sexual component of a male horse's physiology and relate to it sexually?
To a well-adjusted human being, there is nothing sexual about a horse to which he can relate. The joke was about ineptitude and the fact that the joke's punchline consciously or unconsciously involves the mental image of an ignorant attempt at utilization of the horse's implement of reproduction for impossible purposes is nothing more than the absurd surprise which makes us laugh (assuming we have a sense of humor). But to suggest that the joke is improper within any context due to its purported sexual nature is evidence of sexual dysfunction or perversion within the mind of the suggester.
No sexually well-adjusted human being will take offense at the joke. Horses should relate sexually to other horses. Human beings should not, and anyone who can relate to a horse's penis in sexual terms needs to go to the doctor.
Conservatives are in overwhelming proportion healthy sexually and the idiotic left has once again overplayed its hand.
That was the line the brainless NOW-gang used against Clarence Thomas. Are you sure you want to associate yourself with it?
There is no reasoned argument which would work for you.
Try one. I haven't seen you try any reasoned arguments. On anyone. Yet.
Precisely what you don't get is not that you believe yourself a good Christian but that you are perceived thusly.
Hmmmm. I don't understand that line. I guess I'm stupid as well as anti-Christian. Could you re-phrase that?
Instead of putting your lips in action, or letting you anonymous fingers fly on the keyboard, I suggest you put your hands together and pray.
Thank you, Reverend Grunt, for that sagely anonymous advice.
(Although I do find it odd for a Reverend to use the kind of words you've used here, like 'needlebutt' three times within three sentences. And a few other choice terms more scatological.)
It happens I have to leave the keyboard for now. But I'd like to put these questions to all at FreeRepublic:
Is it ever acceptable for a First Lady (any First Lady) to tell blue jokes in public?Would we ever have dreamed we'd be asking this question, just a few years ago? Especially about Laura Bush?
I really like to see thoughtful answers (not spiteful taunts) to those question
Back later.
Did you hear Rush? He said basically that the only people who took this joke the wrong way were liberals. Hmm...
Oh, and he did say that they were the same people who were O-FFENDED by everything and that's it's ALL ABOUT THEM, sort of like when Clinton was in office: ME ME ME ME ME.
You just don't get it do you?You CANNOT be serious. One has nothing to do with the other.That was the line the brainless NOW-gang used against Clarence Thomas. Are you sure you want to associate yourself with it?
Rush is laughing at you today.
She basically said "Yeah, he's an idiot, but, I still love him".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.