Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dallas59

The reason not to have casual sex is on moral grounds NOT because it is dangerious. 'AIDS' is not an std but that does not make casual sex OK.

If we rely on fear of 'AIDS' to enforce moral values the whole thing will backfire when the myth falls apart. This is already taking place. I believe this may be why the left and gays have pushed every 'AIDS' scare to the maximum. They know it will cause a counter reaction in the long run a distroy all moral values in one stroke.

We must not fall into the trap. It is what they want and if we do there will be no stopping them.


______

Sex has nothing to do with AIDS

Result of the largest and longest study of the heterosexual transmission of HIV in the United States:

We followed 175 HIV-discordant couples over time, for a total of approximately 282 couple-years of follow up [...]

We observed no seroconversion after entry into the study. Padian NS et al. Heterosexual transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Northern California: Results from a ten-year study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1997;146(4):350-7.
David W. Rasnick, Ph.D., member of the Scientific Group for the Reappraisal of AIDS, also present this study in  

Sex has nothing to do with AIDS, a letter published by the British Medical Journal.


___


Sex And HIV: Behaviour-Change Trial Shows No Link
The East African (Nairobi)
March 17, 2003
Posted to the web March 19, 2003

By Paul Redfern, Special Correspondent Nairobi
A UK funded trial aimed at reducing the spread of Aids in Uganda by modifying sexual behaviour appears to have had little discernible effect.

The trial, carried out on around 15,000 people in the Masaka region, involved distributing condoms, treating around 12,000 victims of sexually transmitted diseases and counselling.

However, while the trial led to a marked change in sexual behavioural patterns, with the proportion reporting causal sexual partners falling from around 35 per cent to 15 per cent, there was no noticeable fall in the number of new cases of HIV infection, although there was a significant reduction in sexually transmitted diseases such as syphilis and gonorrhoea.
The trial results, which were reported in the British medical journal The Lancet, have already aroused some controversy.

The team leader of the trial, Dr Anatoli Kamalai, acknowledged that there was "no measurable reduction" in HIV incidence with "no hint of even a small effect."

http://allafrica.com/stories/200303190482.html
http://allafrica.com/stories/printable/200303190482.html


85 posted on 05/08/2005 1:43:31 AM PDT by David Lane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: David Lane

The good news is George Bush seems fully aware of this danger and has vastly reduced the role of 'AIDS' in sex education.

His policy is reducing the danger of a backlash but we must ALL play our part.

'AIDS' is a liberal scam and we are the intended victims.


86 posted on 05/08/2005 1:47:21 AM PDT by David Lane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson