[Bushforlife]

"All these questions could be asked and answered at the time the doctor prescribes the medication. When a person needs drugs that are prescribed by a licensed doctor I'd guess they could care less if they receive it from a nameless government functionary or a machine. They just want what is legally their right to have without another man's judgement attached."

So again, your position is that some nameless person with unknown qualifications at the drug company should have the responsibility of dispensing the medication.

Of course the medication is legally their right to have. It is NOT their right to demand that a particular person dispense the medication, however. It is also NOT their right to demand that anyone violate their moral belief that abortion is murder. They are free to get the prescription filled somewhere else.

[blaquebyrd]

"So again, your position is that some nameless person with unknown qualifications at the drug company should have the responsibility of dispensing the medication.

Who cares about the persons name and who says they would be unqualified? They'd more than likely be more qualified than the current pharmacists because they could specialize in the products sold by their particular company. That way the company could screen out any person who does not agree to dispense their products. I see this as a win-win situation. The patients get their prescribed medicine without having to play morality bingo, not knowing which pharmacist on which shift at which store has a problem with which prescription. While the pharmacists could chose to work only for the companies whose drugs do not violate their moral integrity.