Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro

Thanks. Aren't most adaptions beneficial to the survivial of the species? What drives them to adapt? A chemical process I guess - but why? And why do some species end up extinct? I'm sure this argument could go on and on but I guess I'm looking for the short version answer. Thanks again.


491 posted on 05/04/2005 1:24:55 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]


To: mlc9852
I guess I'm looking for the short version answer

The Theory of Evolution. Excellent introductory encyclopedia article.
The Pocket Darwin. Very good, easily readable summary.

492 posted on 05/04/2005 1:30:42 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

It's essentially all passive. Entities (animals, plants, bacteria, etc.) have offspring that are slightly different from themselves.

Those that are adequate (fit, lucky, whatever it takes) survive to have offspring of their own. The next generation is slightly different again.

Inexact replication then selection.


497 posted on 05/04/2005 1:52:47 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
Aren't most adaptions beneficial to the survivial of the species?

Not all mutations are beneficial, but an adaptation pretty much by definition would always be beneficial in the short term. Even then, there's such a thing as an evolutionary blind alley.

501 posted on 05/04/2005 2:22:29 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson