No, it was the right question. You accept micro evolution, but you don't say what keeps all those tiny little changes within a population from adding up to really big changes. Nice try in deflecting the question, though.
Well you've described the faith behind macro evolution. That given enough time small changes translate into entire animals evolving from one to other. Sort of an inverse 2nd law of thermodynamics. This is based on sheer speculation and faith and no evidence.
So the proper question is - what is the evidence to support macro evolution? Evolutionists have to prove macro evolution exists. I don't have to disprove it. Your logic is nuts.