There is genuine debate with the scientific community on global warming. There has been some recent consensus that recent decades actually are warmer. But still serious debate about whether man has any serious input into the global climate.
This is different from the evolution debate, where there is basically zero debate WITHIN the scientific community on the issue. But merely ankle biters on the outside making claims they cannot justify with genuine science.
Nope. Global warming is overwheming accepted by academia as is evolution. Pick up a Scientific American. Again - I'm speaking about macro evolution. There is overwelming evidence for small changes within species, i.e., micro evolution. But that's not where the debate is.