[plain talk]

When you have no logic or facts, label someone an OJ juror. When challenged about evidence for macro evidence, hide behind micro evolution.

I have no skin in this game either way. Even as a Christian, if there was sufficient evidence I would go with the science and still be comfortable in my faith that God designed it all anyway. In the case of macro evolution there is no compelling evidence only sheer speculation based on a few dots.

Arguing with an evolutionist is like arguing with a liberal. Little difference between the two intellectually. Pseudo-intellectuals who know less than they think they do.

[From many - one.]

How many dots is a few?

[narby]

In the case of macro evolution there is no compelling evidence only sheer speculation based on a few dots.

There is massive compelling evidence that has been posted on these threads numerous times.

Yet you are not "compelled" by it. As the OJ jury was not compelled by the DNA evidence.

They didn't understand it. They didn't care about it. So they did not consider it.

[RadioAstronomer]

Arguing with an evolutionist is like arguing with a liberal. Little difference between the two intellectually.

Interesting. Since your education is lacking, you revert to name calling.