I teach this stuff.
There would be a simple list of data points and only "God did it" as an explanation.
No discussion of co-evolution of parasite and host, similarities among primates, common physiologic pathways... maybe "Isn't is neat that God did it that way" but nothing useful.
Ahuradidit placemark.
The big reason I'm an evo-skeptic is my stridently pro-evolution high school and junior high school science classes.
There would be a simple list of data points and only "God did it" as an explanation.
A simple list of data points? If you are teaching taxonomy you should be teaching why man has determined organisms belong in particular categories not guessing as to how creatures developed. You don't have to offer an explanation as to how the creature got the way it did, or you could offer more than one.
No discussion of co-evolution of parasite and host, similarities among primates, common physiologic pathways . . .
And in lieu of that you can teach how blood clots, the heart pumps, DDT effects mosquitos, and how to make roses different colors. You don't need the theory of evolution for any of that. OTOH, philosophical-political bull sessions may mean these things are not getting taught.