No. I interpreted the word donor to mean an abortion clinic could be a donor of sorts -- maybe that is skewing things. The article was unclear where exactly they got the stem cells. You can take the stem cells of an aborted baby with cornea developed -- because they did not state that the donors were adults.
I also was trying to interpret this at 3AM.
I wish they would have explicitly stated these are not embryonic stem cells and they do use aborted babies as donors.
Stem cells from the patient or a donor are used to redevelop the cornea...
----
No baby needed
While liberal media outlets might well weasel on the source of stem cells by using 'donor' to include murdered, unwilling 'donors', the fact that the article explicitly says 'from the patient' shows that the procedure works with adult stem cells (like all the successful stem cell procedures to date). Autodonation (patient as source) also has the virtue of no chance of tissue rejection and no need for anti-rejection drugs (a point which should be made loudly to everyone who through stupidity or wickedness equates 'stem cells' with 'embryonic stem cells'.)