Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin_geek

Not only your excellent example, geek, but many times these "tests" to determine "genetic problems" are Just Dead Wrong.

The AMA *admits* to a very high error rate in diagnosis, I wonder what the real numbers are. And we are going to kill babies based on this?


11 posted on 05/02/2005 5:32:44 PM PDT by mamaduck (I'm a lurker . . .not a fighter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: mamaduck

I was all set to toss out "Stephen Hawking" too.

I'd no idea the tests used to determine genetic abnormality were that inaccurate.

Btw, I knew three adults that had been adopted as children, and they referred to themselves as "would be abortions" or some such. They were under no illusions as to their chances of being born in this day and age.


14 posted on 05/02/2005 5:41:44 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson