Replies

"Waiting until 2005 would have spared Jesus' life?" ... I was wondering about that too.

Wonderful. We have a disagreement about the scripture.

Which is all I have about Genesis vs. evolution. Genesis only has a few hundred words of detail about the creation. Not nearly enough to tell the method God used for any of His work.

I interpret the Bible my way, and you interpret it another. But the bottom line is that neither of our interpretations should be taught in science class. Pushing creationism there invites a negative reaction that is not helpful in bringing people to understand God.

Bring people into your church. THEN talk about HOW you believe God created the universe. Attempting to do it the other way round does more damage than good.

"Genesis only has a few hundred words of detail about the creation. Not nearly enough to tell the method God used for any of His work." The bible was not meant to be a science book. it's about God's creation, his people, their history, and their Salvation. Those few hundred words have more clues to how he created the earth than you think. You just have to learn how to read them.

And what discrepancy of scripture is there? Christ came and fulfilled prophecy, he served the purpose as was foretold in old testament prophecy. He was not meant to live on, He was God's sacrifice for your sin so you can live forever. I don't think you have a very good understanding of just what Christ did, and why. What will be the purpose of Christ's second coming, do you think he's coming to rule the earth for 1000 years? That is wrong. Christ's millennium has already past, it's almost up. You better hit the books and start trying to understand Daniels prophacies.