Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dream Job: Stay-At-Home Mom
Salary.com ^ | unknown | Regina O'Brien

Posted on 05/02/2005 1:10:49 PM PDT by sageb1

So why do thousands of career women nationwide opt to put their careers and salary-earning potential on the back burner to stay home to care for their children?

A Labor of Love

"I had zero experience taking care of children before I had my own," said Laura Mercer, mother of two boys and professional stay-at-home mom outside of Las Vegas, Nev. "Being a career woman most of my adult life, the thought of being a stay-at-home mom didn't even occur to me."

(Excerpt) Read more at salary.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: feminism; moms; mothers; sahms; stayathomemoms; truelove; women; workingmoms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: frogjerk

With all due respect to mother's and fathers. I think the tender years doctrine (despite the PC BS that demands courts rule to the contrary) is still important. The notion is that children need their mother in at least the first three (though I have heard five) years of their development.

A new developing child needs a mother in those tender years.


41 posted on 05/02/2005 1:53:10 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: frogjerk
I would argue that you are wrong. Raising a well adjusted, productive member of society is actually priceless.

Then what was the point of a salary analysis.

43 posted on 05/02/2005 1:54:45 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

I wouldn't want to make a bet on that one. I don't know any stay-at-home moms who get to work 9 to 5, then come home and put their feet up.


44 posted on 05/02/2005 1:54:49 PM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

That's my dream job too. When I was married I was the money making, the wife, the mom and the house wife. Now that I am divorced I am the I was the money makin, the mom and the house wife (but not the wife anymore!).


45 posted on 05/02/2005 1:56:15 PM PDT by angelanddevil2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
"Maybe if more mothers did this, the problems with teens would be a little problematic."

I think you meant less problematic and yes, I agree. The problems this society is having with teen violence would begin to disintegrate overnight, as this is what caused them in the first place.

46 posted on 05/02/2005 1:57:27 PM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

They would start taxing the working Dads for the highly valuable services of the stay-at-home Moms...


47 posted on 05/02/2005 1:57:51 PM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
The fact that a mom puts in a 40-hr. workweek, plus 60 hours of OT means nothing because we aren't earning the bucks.

The state required drones and slaves. Besides Hher Hitlary knows how to raise your children better than you. In fact her village factory is made just for raising good citizens of zee vourld.
48 posted on 05/02/2005 1:58:27 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
I wouldn't want to make a bet on that one.

I would. I'm not devaluing the job that is being done by stay-at-home moms by saying it is not the same as that done by a CEO. Saying that it is beyond 9 to 5 doesn't get you there.

49 posted on 05/02/2005 1:59:54 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: piceapungens
"My wife has been a stay-at home for two years now and absolutely loves it, I'm sure glad we can afford it - many can't"

I could afford it either, but I did it anyway. You really can learn to live cheaper. And by cheap, I'm talking shoe-string. It CAN be done.

50 posted on 05/02/2005 2:00:11 PM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Look at what the government gets from middle-class working moms:
  1. Additional taxes
  2. Jobs in the service industries (prepared foods, cleaning services, laundry services, day-care) that employ people who might otherwise be on welfare

51 posted on 05/02/2005 2:02:03 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (What does the wolf care how many sheep there be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
If a wife wanted to stay home just to be a good wife, would that be a bad thing?

Well, it depends who you ask. On a good day, DH thinks it's a good idea. On a day when there are 2 grandchildren, 1 1/2 students and a couple of dogs running around while two phone lines are ringing....let's just say I've considered working outside the home just so I'd get a lunch hour!!

52 posted on 05/02/2005 2:02:39 PM PDT by blu (The Pope, the Gipper and the Iron Lady...now THAT'S a trifecta!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Maybe it's time that Americans cut the consuming, made better choices about what it is necessary to "have." Keeping up with the Joneses gets pretty expensive. The more "things" we have, the more time we need to spend taking care of them.

I've noticed another shift in how we think of money. It seems as if now, your standard of living is based upon how much credit you can get, rather than the salary you earn. I am struck now by how cars and houses are advertised with prices of x dollars per month. I don't recall seeing that when I was growing up. People get roped into monthly payments and then they are trapped financially, with real danger if someone ends up out of work involuntarily. No one seems to think about total cost, it's always "how much can I finance?" They end up upside down on expensive cars that are financed over 84 months and carrying huge mortgages at artificially low introductory rates or interest only payments...

53 posted on 05/02/2005 2:02:48 PM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

We afforded it and we were as poor as church-mice. Home-canned fruits and vegetables go a long way. Also, a take-out burger back then was a real TREAT.


54 posted on 05/02/2005 2:04:21 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez was't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I have enjoyed raising my kids. We have sacrificed a great deal in order to keep me at home, but I know it will be worth it in the long run.


55 posted on 05/02/2005 2:11:17 PM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (WWW.TEACH-YOUR-KIDS.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
One of the things we found when my wife quit work (pregnant with our son) was that it had a surprisingly low impact on our quality of life, financially speaking.

She didn't need to buy or care for work clothes. She didn't burn nearly as much gas. She loves to cook, and suddenly had the time, so we didn't eat/order out nearly as often.

Don't get me started on marginal tax rates...

Projecting ahead to daycare costs, we could see that we wouldn't be that far ahead if she did go back to work.

Which she didn't want to do anyway. Still homeschooling our ten year old!

56 posted on 05/02/2005 2:15:02 PM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

100% of my wife's earnings cover our federal income taxes.

If taxes weren't so high, she wouldn't work even though we don't have children yet.

the only reason she works now is to pad our 401K's and our Roth's so that once we have kids we don't have to worry so much about our retirement!


57 posted on 05/02/2005 2:26:06 PM PDT by IL Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: anniegetyourgun

Most liberals I know complain about the economy forcing women to enter the workforce. Most familys are a 2 income family nowadays.


59 posted on 05/02/2005 2:34:47 PM PDT by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tarheel1
I'm 44 and expect to be a grandma in about two or two and a half years (my eldest daughter is getting married next year).
I had my first of five children at 22. I stayed at home raising my children.

I was at a party this weekend where there were a load of young kids. Quite a few had mommies my age. I am so glad I had children early and now can't wait for the next phase of my life and be a young grandma.

60 posted on 05/02/2005 2:36:46 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson