You are diverting the entire argument.
When you believe that God determines when we are born and die, it crosses over different instances of lawmaking abuse. If you believe that man is out of his realm when killing off the weak in society, it will show in any discussion of a manmade law that furthers the right to kill others.
This is not inconsistent. Your attempt to discount based on frivilous other issues is merely an attempt to discount Rush's views that this was wrong.
What about the views of Hannity, Jeb Bush, Pres. Bush, Tom Delay, Fred Barnes, Krauthammer and tons of others? All inconsistent?
When you believe that God determines when we are born and die, it crosses over different instances of lawmaking abuse. If you believe that man is out of his realm when killing off the weak in society, it will show in any discussion of a manmade law that furthers the right to kill others.
So what you are saying is medical intervention is what God intends and the wishes of individuals' should be ignored...It is your Faith which should determine how long my death should last. Thanks, but no thanks.
My argument was not frivolous. How can we dismiss the same argument that resulted in thousands of more deaths--give inspections one more try--and then turn around and say after more than a decade of legal process, that it wasn't enough for the Shiavo case?
As to the pundits you listed and many more...I've lost all trust in them. I will take pleasure in not renewing my Rush 24/7 subscription for a third time in Febuary. And will not buy any more conservative pundits' books. Not that I would have ever bought Hannity's.