he can either sue every one of his accusers for slander and stand up for himslef and explain how its a great thingto teach history in a school setting and point out the ideology of everyone of his accusers and go on the offencive with as much zeal as they are or like every other spineless coward with an r by his name he can bend over for every one of them and then say thank you sir may I please have another and die the thousands deaths of the coward.if he chooses that route he deserves whatever happens to him from now on
Support David Horowitz in his Academic Bill of Rights LEGISLATION campaign. I suggested this to the webmaster here at FR under the title: FReep Academia.
Here's a few exerpts from the link above:
When I first floated the idea of my Academic Bill of Rights in Colorado, for example, one of my first stops was to meet with Elizabeth Hoffman, then president of the University of Colorado. President Hoffman was very cordial, but told me there was no problem of missing intellectual diversity at her university and besides its official academic freedom regulations already contained all the protections I was proposing.
Previously, the arguments made by defenders of the status quo were pretty much exhausted by Elizabeth Hoffmans two points: We have no problem, and even if we did, the protections youre proposing are already in place in our own regulations.
Hoffman was to learn the hard way that she actually did have a problem when the public controversy generated over the Ward Churchill affair led to the termination of her job. I had warned her when we met that the monolithic character of her faculty was a scandal waiting to happen. The lack of intellectual diversity on college faculties has produced a new phenomenon in American academic life: the presence of tenured extremists on faculties, and not only at some universities, but at virtually every one.
Moreover, virtually all of these academic freedom provisions are formulated as faculty rights or faculty responsibilities. Virtually none codify rights that apply specifically to students.
Armstrong referred to a biology class at a campus in the Pennsylvania State University system that was entirely taken up with a showing of Farenheit 9/11, Michael Moores propaganda film against the Bush Administration. The film was shown to students during the presidential election campaign of 2004. The biology professors agenda in showing the film obviously had nothing to do with biology and was clearly political.